Descartes' Discourse on the Method (Part IV) Research Paper

Descartes cover on the Method (Part IV) - Research Paper ExampleDescartes Discourse on the Method (Part 4) In part four of his Discourse method, Rene Descartes delves into finding out the metaphysical basis of noesis or truth. Having resolved to inquiry any belief that he had earlier on held, and to subject only his earlier beliefs into critical evaluation through his discourse method, Descartes had to find a rational basis of friendship that would religious service as the root word for his system of Philosophy. Descartes sought to break from the past after realising that he could inquiry everything that he had earlier on held as the truth, he therefore, realised that all the theories of truth or of companionship that his predecessors had given were insufficient and false. Descartes, therefore, started doubting everything including his own existence. hardly in the course of proving his own existence, Descartes ended up with a surprising argument proving Gods existence. This paper analysis and evaluates Descartes discourse method in part four and focuses on how Descartes deviated from proving his own existence as the basis of all knowledge to demo the existence of God as the source of truth. ... le he can doubt everything, he cannot, however, doubt his own existence because the doubting of his own existence requires him first to exist so as to be able to doubt. Consequently, one has to be so as to doubt, and with this realisation, Descartes found an beyond doubt(predicate) basis of truth that would serve as the basis of his epistemology. Following this realisation he proclaimed, I think, therefore I am (Descartes, Discourse on the Method, Part Four, online). This means that his very doubting self is the proof of his existence. Descartes, therefore, conceived himself as a mentation self because his thinking or doubting nature is the only thing that he could not doubt. But proving his own existence wasnt the end of his journey in finding out the metap hysical foundation of knowledge. This is because after proving the truth of his own existence, he had now to proceed to prove the truth of other things away to him. Having proved his own existence as an indisputable truth, Descartes sought to know what makes propositions true. Since some propositions are true, corresponding the one that he had already proved about his own existence, there must be something planetary in such propositions that make them true. And reflecting on the proposition that he had already proved as indubitable truth, Descartes realised that the only assurance that he had of the truth of the proposition, I think, therefore I am, is that he could clear and distinctly see that in order to think, he had to exist first. Descartes, therefore, took it as a general rule, that any(prenominal) is conceived clearly and distinctly must be true (Descartes, Discourse on the Method, Part four, online). But the chore in applying his general rule lay in recognizing the thi ngs that could be conceived clearly and