Comparing four or more poems Essay

The world around you is full of kinships. Some acceptable, some bad. A relationship can bring happiness and love whilst also saving sadness and unpleasantness. Two people having emotional feeling for each new(prenominal), sharing those feelings with comfort and pleasure, form a relationship. Many will say that a relationship is the vanquish thing ever, whilst others may say its also the worst. When a relationship forms why does there al agencys engage to be a good and a bad part? One of the poems I have studied is this be the verse by Philip Larkin. It is nigh a child blaming e verything that has happened to him on his parents.Larkin has verbalised his feelings for a relationship by using the bitter and brutal tidings fuck. He chooses these choices of news programs to shock the readers and members of his family. When the poem was write in 1960 the word fuck would have been even more collide withensive than it is now. Ask yourself why call the poem this be the verse? Larki n uses the word be to get his consign across on relationships. Using the word be makes his opinion a fixed thing. Larkins uses of language in this poem sets out the pessimistic word picture that your parents destroy you.You can tell that him and his parents have never really got along by the quote they fuck you up your mum and dad. Larkin is applying that your parents mess you up when he states they may non mean to but they do. He also sets up the image of hatred by using the rhythm to cut in an effect of anger. The rhythm is bouncy and contracts with the message. Having said that it also depends on your mood when reading the poem. Larkin simply had a disruptive childhood by the touch sensation and the mood of his poem. Add some extra just for you. Larkin dents the ironic image by implying he is ashamed of his parents and their parents.The second verse sets up the ikon that Larkin mightiness have changed his mind about his parents as the first word is but. However I was wron g he carries on throughout the verse slagging off his parents and grandparents by saying by fools in old style hats and coats. On verse three he still hasnt changed his mind about his distraught childhood and his hatred towards his parents. It deepens like a coastal shelf Larkin explains that his hurt and hatred built up and deepens more every time he got hurt. Larkin obviously cannot forget about this childhood and forgive his parents for the way he has turned out.He states get out as early as you can. Larkin gets the impression across the just way to stop you tuning out like you family is to kill yourself. This be the verse is a misanthropic poem. Does this mean that Philip Larkin agrees with Sartre, that hell is other people? My opinion towards this poem is that the poet, Philip Larkin is cruel and bitter towards his parents. He gives off the impression very clearly that he has no respect for his parents and grandparents what so ever. And it is very clear that he is not willing to forgive his parents for the way in which he has turned out.However his opinion is different than mine. I feel that the way you turn out has some effect on your parents. However most of it is up to you, by the way you choose to dot things and the way you choose to select from your mistakes yourself. Another poem I have chosen to study is called the chuck equation written by Brian geta. What is a healthy equation? One that works, that provides an answer. clog is implying that the sick equation is one that doesnt work. Signifying that his parents dont work well together. At the beginning of each poem this be the verse and the sick equation they both have a point of comparison.Both poets bring the image across that a relationship is a fixed and bad thing by Patten using despotic and Larkin using be. Are both poets establishing the same message? Pattens poem talks about the difference at home and school. In school I learned that one and one made two and could have been engraved in stone, an absolute I could not question or refute. Patten gives out the impression that at school everything has an answer however at home zero adds up. He the goes on to use the ironic message but home sweet home he uses irony to get the message across that he doesnt care.I feel using irony has more of an impact that not using it. In the second verse Patten uses the strong word raw. He describes that he is feeling hurt and the hatred towards his parents has grown strongly. In that raw cocoon of parental hate. I came to believe how it was best that one remained one, for two, one at least would suffer so. Here Patten explains that for the best its better to keep yourself to yourself, as if you are to become perpetrate at least one of you would hurt. He objects with his mum and dad being together as one of them is always hurting.In the second verse Patten is applying that he had love but permit it go by the comment believing this I threw away so many gifts- I never let love stay enough to take to take root, but by thinking myself of too little worth I crushed all its messengers. His parents have let love go for him, they have spoiled love for him, the way his mum and dad acted towards each other impacted into Patten that love is not a good thing. He goes on to stay I grew-or did not grow-and kept my head down low, and drifted with the crowd. Even though he grew on the outside in height he still remained immature on the inside.I stayed apart, stayed one claiming separateness was out of choice, and at every wedding ceremonial occasion I saw the shadow albatross- divorce- fall over groom and bride. By saying this it implied that for some time that Patten never had the courage to have a full time relationship, as he was scared that the same might happen to him that happened to his parents. It feels that Patten sees a divorce at the beginning of a wedding. In the final verse Patten states that he cant blame his parents for the way he turned out. (Unlike Larkin ) he explains to the reader that he cant judge everyone for the way they are or that way they have been brought up.He changes his opinion on his parents towards the end of the poem. Its absurd to believe all others are as damaged as we, the lesson that our parents taught he clearly feels he cannot blame his family for what had happened to him now and in the past. He can forgive and forget, unlike Larkin. Unlike Larkin, Patten chooses to only highlight the positive side of a relationship. Pattens choice of words hammer to message into the head that not all relationships are bad, just because he had a bad experience he learnt that you will always be able to love someone.The language he uses relates to his loneliness and hurt in his past. He expresses his poisonous past through his poetry. Another poem I looked at is looking for dad again by Brain Patten. You can guess what Patten is personnel casualty to talk about before reading it for yourself. His dad. The poem is about a boy who thinks his dad has ran away because he hadnt tided his room, when really it was just another(prenominal) relationship ending disruptly. The poem is set out from the others, when you look at a poem the first thing you will notice is the fact is has verses. flavour for dad is all joint together without any verses.